Leading Article: Mr Blair can play a role in encouraging Middle East peace
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.WHEN THE new Israeli prime minister, Ehud Barak, sits down to chat with Tony Blair today, reflections on how to keep a peace process on course will be high on their agenda. Mr Blair's own agreement in Northern Ireland has been grounded, temporarily we hope, on the shoals of mistrust between ancient antagonists. But suddenly, with the downfall of Bibi Netanyahu and advent of Mr Barak, there is hope that it will soon be possible to refloat the nearly sunk Oslo and Wye peace agreements between the Palestinians and the Israelis.
The omens appear to be promising for Mr Barak. He has formed a broad- based government to replace Mr Netanyahu's right-wing coalition and, earlier this week, four non-Jewish members of the Knesset joined the parliamentary foreign affairs committee, the first Arab members to do so. In Washington, President Clinton has promised $2.4bn a year of military aid, $930m a year of economic aid and $1.2bn to implement the Wye agreement; 50 F-16 jet fighters and a battery of anti-missile missiles to help maintain Israel's "strategic edge"; and the addition of an Israeli astronaut to the Nasa crew list for the space shuttle in 2000. In the Arab capitals, from Cairo to Amman to Damascus, there have been almost enthusiastic words of welcome and encouragement for Mr Barak's government.
What, if anything, Mr Blair can add to this impressive line-up is his much-vaunted influence in Europe. If, for example, a peace treaty is signed with Syria that requires the Israeli settlers, who are deeply entrenched on the Golan Heights, to move to Israel proper, even more money will be needed to help them re-establish their homes and farms and businesses. Syria, too, will hope to get a peace dividend and, if it is to join the comity of nations, the EU could grant it favourable trade terms and development grants. Also, well-equipped and experienced soldiers may be needed to patrol the new peace lines that separate Israel from Syria; and here too Europe, and the UK in particular, is well supplied.
But even with all these offers of assistance, the process must begin somewhere, and what better place than with the one powerful neighbouring state yet to sign a peace treaty with Israel? President Assad has an evident desire to get the Golan Heights back for Syria, and both he and Mr Barak are strong leaders who are well positioned to take the necessary risks to conclude a deal. Peace between Israel and Syria (and, subsequently, with the Palestinians themselves) would remove such a major source of tension from the Middle East that it is well worth paying the price to help speed it on its way. And Tony Blair might get a fillip of encouragement from the lesson that even stalled peace processes can get back on the road.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments