Leading Article: China's one-party state is alive and kicking
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.IF EVER there were a good example of the continuing relevance of the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights 50 years after its inception, it is the decision of a Chinese court to sentence opponents of the regime to more than a decade in prison for "subverting state power".
Those convicted had committed the so-called crime of attempting to register a new political grouping, the Chinese Democracy Party, a freedom to which they are fully entitled. They were denied access to legal representation. Their punishment is an affront to natural justice.
The action dashes hopes that the Chinese government had itself raised. For the last two years, it had seemed to be making progress towards a democratic future. After the horrors of Tiananmen Square, there was talk of a "Peking spring", a new openness to, and tolerance of, dissent.
The Chinese government has made several welcome gestures, including signing up to UN treaties on civil and political rights. The UN Special Commissioner on Human Rights, Mary Robinson, was met with courtesy on her visit in September; an annual motion at the UN criticising China's human rights record was dropped accordingly.
There has undoubtedly been progress made in the liberalisation of China, not least in the field of the criminal law, as witnessed by the British Prime Minister and his wife on their recent trip to China. The Communist Party's grip on legal training has been loosened; trials have been made more public.
This is all a long way from the madness of the Cultural Revolution, in which millions died. It is increasingly difficult for the Chinese state to maintain a monopoly on news. Internet sites beyond the reach of the authorities are being utilised to mobilise dissent. Expectations are rising. The economy is liberalising, and citizens with an increasing stake in business enterprise are demanding more information about those in charge. Debate has been sparked about "corruption", coded criticism of the ruling elite.
This is why the jailing of these two activists is such a disappointment, an attack on some of the best and brightest Chinese citizens. One of their number, Xu Wenli, has already spent 12 years in prison for his principles. His continued defiance is a testament to his courage. There may be few results from attempting to face down his captors, but the West cannot abandon him and his peers. They must know that they have our moral and political support.
While China has been making concessions to civil rights, political rights are as distant as ever. The one-party state is alive and well - a further embarrassment to the Prime Minister's foreign policy, given his praise of China during his recent visit. Tibet remains occupied. Freedom of speech and political organisation, both fundamental to the Declaration of Human Rights, remain curtailed. Until that changes, China's reforms will remain cosmetic.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments