Ivory Towers: Ectoplasm shortage

William Hartston
Tuesday 14 December 1993 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

WHY do joggers jog? There has been no shortage of research into the mental state of joggers, but only recently has anyone investigated the more basic question: why do non-joggers not jog? The answers confirm that people who don't jog have just as good reasons for not doing so as joggers have for jogging.

William F Vitulli and A Nicholas de Pace III, of the University of South Alabama, report their findings in 'Manifest reasons for Jogging and Not Jogging' (Perceptual and Motor Skills, vol 75, 115-20). Joggers, it would seem, jog because of 'health reasons' or because 'it increases my awareness of who I am'. Non-joggers, apparently already aware of who they are, choose boredom, discomfort, past injury and loneliness as their main reasons for not jogging. The researchers suggests that behaviour modification techniques might change non-joggers into joggers, but further research is needed.

One rare area where further research is not needed was identified in a recent issue of Nature, where a world shortage of ectoplasm is among the phenomena explained by new theories of the paranormal.

Comparing paranormal phenomena of recent times with those of 60 years ago, Dr S F Blinkhorn concludes that psychic influences are weaker than they used to be. 'Strong paranormal phenomena of all kinds have declined to vanishing point, just as good scientific methods for studying them have reached perfection,' he complains.

His first tentative explanation is that 'a lot more people have died since the 1930s and the consequent congestion in communication channels between this life and the 'other side' prevents reliable contact.' If this 'Cellular Telephone Hypothesis' proves incorrect, he proposes an alternative hypothesis of political correctness: 'Red Indian spirit guides have withdrawn their labour until we start calling them Native Americans.'

His next theory relates to the recent absence of spoon-benders on television: 'Could it be that video recorders destroy the conditions of calm and concentration upon which they depend?' he asks.

Finally, Dr Blinkhorn points out that ectoplasm, when photographed, bears a striking resemblance to cheesecloth. The marked drop in ectoplasmic manifestations reflects a similar decline in the availability of cheesecloth and butter muslin. Have improvements in bulk-processing methods for dairy products led to the demise of one psychic industry? Dr Blinkhorn believes they have and concludes this is one academic area where further research is better avoided.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in