Independent Pursuits: Bridge

Alan Hiron
Tuesday 10 November 1998 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

"THE OPERATION was a success but..." murmured North softly after watching his partner go down in Six Hearts on this deal. South scowled - he had just spotted the 100 per cent play that he had missed.

South opened One Heart and North responded 2 No-trumps (agreeing hearts and forcing to game). South's next bid of Three Clubs was something of a surprise to North, for it showed a clubshortage and an interest in progress. North cue-bid Three Spades, South co-operated with Four Diamonds, and North repeated his spade cue-bid.

Next South showed his first-round club control with Five Clubs, and North bid Five Diamonds. South's jump to Six Hearts ended the auction, for neither partner held third-round diamond control. Very elegant, and it was clearly the right contract.

West led 2Q against the slam and declarer ruffed East's ace. He drew trumps and tested the spades. When they proved to be 4-2, he ruffed the last spade and turned his attention to diamonds. However, his play of the ace and another was not a success and East came to two diamond tricks to defeat the contract.

It is true that South would have been home if the diamonds had broken 3-2, and also if West held four or more in the suit, but he had missed a foolproof safety play. He should start the diamonds by leading low from dummy. Suppose East plays low - then declarer puts in the eight. Should West win the nine, he must either concede a ruff and discard, or return a diamond.

If, as may well happen, East plays the nine on the first diamond lead, South takes his ace and leads a low diamond, inserting the 10 if West plays low.

Then, again, South is home whatever the diamond break.

East-West game; dealer South

North

4A K 5

!Q 10 8 6 3

#K 10 4 3

2K

West East

4J 9 7 2 410 6

!7 5 !2

#6 #Q J 9 7

2Q J 9 8 6 3 2A 10 7 5 4 2

South

4Q 8 4 3

!A K J 9 4

#A 8 5 2

2none

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in