In Brief

Tuesday 20 April 1999 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Peter Sayers (letter, 20 April) assumes that the National Lottery was designed with common sense. More people winning smaller sums - enough to pay a bill or settle a debt - would, indeed, be socially useful. Unfortunately, the purpose of the lottery is the age-old one of providing a route to affluence for a very few. Whilst this chance exists, poorer people can be soothed by it, while society remains unchanged.

ELAINE D HOPKINSON

Cropton, North Yorkshire

Sir: Alan J Page (letter, 20 April) says it should be an offence to prescribe the Pill to girls under the age of 16. If Mr Page believes that being refused the Pill will dissuade a girl from having under-age sex, he is naive. The law has little or no influence against the force of peer pressure and the desire to appear adult. Cigarettes and alcohol are illegal to sell to under-age people because they cause physical harm. The Pill is legal because it is a force for good: namely the prevention of unwanted pregnancies.

BEN BAWDEN

Godalming, Surrey

Sir: Your review of Bella Bathurst's book The Lighthouse Stevensons (17 April) states that the line ended with Thomas's son, the writer Robert Louis Stevenson. This may be where the book ends, but another two generations served the Northern Lights: RLS's cousins David A and Charles, the sons of Thomas's brother David, were succeeded by D Alan, the son of Charles. (See A Star for Seamen by Craig Mair, John Murray, 1978). No wonder RLS was proud of his family's achievements.

RONA WIGHTMAN

London SW4

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in