Flexible finance for the freelance

Roger Trapp
Wednesday 11 February 1998 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

If you don't have a regular, monthly salary, you may be treated warily by the financial services industry, warns Roger Trapp.

In a recent report issued under the auspices of the RSA's "Redefining Work" project, it was acknowledged that the financial services industry had been slow to respond to changes in the workplace.

Commentators suggest that many practitioners are still so traditional that they would, for example, regard a middle-aged miner as a better bet than a young information technology consultant. This is because while the miner has probably only got a few working years left to him, he is employed full-time - in contrast with the IT consultant, who could have a very prosperous future, albeit based on contracts and assignments rather than full-time positions.

The differing treatments are most apparent when applying for a mortgage. A recent graduate, say, in their first job will be in a much better position than the freelance, who will have to supply three years' accounts indicating that they have sufficient income to cover the payments and other outgoings. However, Amanda Davidson, of the London-based independent financial advisers Holden Meehan, points out that many lenders are becoming more aware; they will, for example, accept that people can be paid in lump sums rather than in regular monthly amounts and make their calculations appropriately.

Flexibility is, however, much better established in the pensions arena. Though regular monthly payments are regarded as the norm, it is perfectly acceptable to make lump sum payments at any time in the year. It is less advisable to stop and start regular payments. Ms Davidson says that she recommends clients to put something fairly modest into a pension every month on the grounds that it is "good discipline" and then top this up with lump sums, depending on income flow. Savings, she adds, are "incredibly flexible". But there needs to be a combination of secure savings and money accessible in an emergency or if income flow slows down, putting regular commitments at risk.

Finally, a word of warning. Personal finance experts point out that self- employed people can be tempted to take out policies that provide protection against loss of income through illness or accidents. But such schemes can be expensive and also highly selective in the conditions they cover. It may be better simply to keep enough funds in reserve to cover such eventualities.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in