You Write The Reviews: The Incredible Hulk (12A)

Reviewed,James Megarry
Monday 23 June 2008 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Graaagghh! The "green goliath" has returned. Following the disastrous CGI romp that was Hulk, the version gets things back on track, with Bruce Banner in South America, dodging the hand of General "Thunderbolt" Ross and enduring plenty of mishaps.

Fans will notice the Hulk theme tune from the 1970s TV series, a more sinister portrayal of General Ross et al, and a reclusive, tormented Banner (whose isolation is portrayed to perfection by Edward Norton), which are all in the spirit of Stan Lee's original. Then again, with Lee on hand to produce the movie (and to make his usual cameo appearance in the film), you know that the story has half a chance.

Thank goodness the director, Louis Leterrier, had the sense to explore Banner's personal side, rather than rely on visuals. Liv Tyler's play on Betty Ross's tender side adds some heart – although she's a little too sincere at times – and the weedy, apologetic Banner portrayed by Norton isn't quite the Bruce that you may remember. But there's enough characterisation to make us believe in them.

Tim Roth as Emil Blonsky doesn't hold me, though. He may well be playing a cold and calculating villain, but there's something about Roth versus Norton that doesn't click – perhaps Norton should have been tougher by contrast. But then, the Jekyll and Hyde-like relationship between Banner and the Hulk wouldn't have been so obvious.

The studio bosses can't afford to scare people too much here, so instead of a real-life Mr Universe in green make-up, we once again have a Hulk created in CGI. At least Leterrier's direction makes more of the sheer menace of the creature. At times, it does feel as if there's something scary about Banner's transformations (as there should be, surely), and although the action tries to take over towards the end, the suspense gives the film more to live up to. As the story moves along, the clashes between the Hulk and the military personnel pose a question: who are the real monsters? Hence, Stan Lee's moral message in the comic book about power in the wrong hands is conveyed quite well. If there's one thing that's definitely wrong, it's that the humour takes too long to get going. By the time the jokes and one-liners come in, the story has already grown too serious. Ty Burrell's Dr Samson proves to be annoying rather than amusing light relief.

The Incredible Hulk is not in the same league as the other summer blockbuster, the masterful Iron Man. On the other hand, it's about 10 times better than the last Hulk flick, and at least this one feels like a Marvel movie.

James Megarry, registration support assistant, Worcester

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in