Shortbus (18)

Nicholas Barber
Saturday 02 December 2006 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

In Hollywood films, sex is usually a cross between between a ballet and an Olympic event, while art-house directors prefer to see it as a sordid confirmation of what loathsome beasts we human beings are.

Shortbus takes a different position. Quite a few different positions, in fact. Here, for once, carnality is presented as a source of relief, frustration and healthy exercise, and something which may involve three interlocked naked men singing "The Star-Spangled Banner".

The main characters are a married sex therapist who has never had an orgasm, and two gay lovers who might be ready to bring in a third party. Their stories come together, so to speak, in a weekly New York "salon" where the guests socialise, watch cabaret acts, and, more importantly, have orgies. Not much is left to the imagination. When we see two characters getting intimate, the actors themselves are getting intimate. Shortbus is the most graphically sexual film ever to make it into a mainstream cinema.

But that's "graphic", not "pornographic". The couplings and triplings aren't there to titillate; they're there because sex is what the film is about. It'd work perfectly well even if it didn't drip with quite so many bodily fluids, partly because of its amusing mockery of New Yorkers' pretensions and neuroses, and partly because the people getting their kit off happen to be flawed individuals with plausible emotional dilemmas. Frankly, it's less shocking to see explicit sex these days than it is to see a heartfelt comedy-drama with zinging one-liners and appealing characters.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in