Pusher 3 (18) <!-- none onestar twostar threestar fourstar fivestar -->

Anthony Quinn
Thursday 08 June 2006 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Film classification is so lax nowadays that when a movie gets an "18" certificate slapped on it you can be pretty sure it will contain strong meat. For the first hour of the Danish lowlife drama Pusher 3, however, the prospect of violence (it rejoices in the tag-line "I'm The Angel of Death") is unfulfilled, and instead of gasping in horror I heard myself chuckling, not entirely from nervousness.

I hadn't seen writer-director Nicolas Winding Refn's previous Pusher films - this third is apparently not a sequel but a variation on the 1996 original - but I had seen and admired his first foray into English-language cinema, the Lynchian, fugue-like thriller Fear X (2003). Pusher 3 examines a day in the life of Serbian drug baron Milo (Zlatko Buric), whose standing in the Copenhagen underworld is under threat from abrasive new gangs on the block. Fiftyish, heavy-set and lugubrious, Milo is also battling his own drug problem, distractedly attending an addicts' support group where he announces that he has been clean for five days. He could use a little boost today, though, because not only has he to offload a huge quantity of heroin but also, just as importantly, he has to cook dinner for 50 at his daughter's 25th birthday party. And, by degrees, the day starts going downhill: he manages to give his henchmen food poisoning, the heroin turns out to be dodgy, and the bantam gangster who's supposed to sell it disappears.

Milo doesn't exhibit grace under pressure, exactly, but he's not the twitching wreck that Ray Liotta became when he had to juggle a similar dinner-and-drug deal at the end of Goodfellas. Indeed, for a career criminal, he's a likeable fellow, much more so than his hard-faced daughter (Marinela Dekic) or any of the thugs with whom he associates. It's just his misfortune to be desperate for a fix at a time when he most needs his wits about him and, once the business turns from drugs into people-trafficking, you sense that director Refn is about to rub our noses in something quite gruesome. So it proves, yet even in the shocking Grand Guignol of its climax one fights the urge to belly-laugh as much as to barf, a giddiness abetted by Buric's tremendous, bear-like, presence - think Tony Soprano with a longer fuse - and Refn's sly, almost English sense of the ridiculous. Nothing tickled me more than the scene in which Milo, his banquet ruined, dashes to the local Chinese and asks for 50 portions of fried fish. Comes the straight-faced reply: "To eat here or take away?"

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in