Overlord, (15)

Reviewed,Anthony Quinn
Thursday 31 January 2008 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

This deeply affecting movie, first released in 1975 but almost forgotten, distils the run-up to the Normandy landings of June 1944 into a lyrical, black-and-white dream of stoicism and sacrifice. Stuart Cooper made this docudrama in collaboration with the Imperial War Museum and ace cinematographer John Alcott, who uses period lenses and stock to blend with archive footage of aerial bombardment, blitzed streets and military manoeuvres.

We follow an unassuming young man named Tom (Brian Stirner) through training, moments of camaraderie and the anxious wait for combat; the film seems to be happening inside Tom's mind, as he tries to reconcile a historical shift with his own life – and the premonition of his death. Most war movies focus on heroism, and Overlord does, too, but in such a spare, unheroic fashion that even its stock elements – like the politely romantic interlude with a girl at a dance, and the banter with mates (Nicholas Ball, Davyd Harries) – become terribly moving. Stirner's innocent, unexceptional face haunts the film long before it's over, and part of its greatness is that we seem to read in it an expression of individual loss that war otherwise mulches into the generic and impersonal.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in