Mission: Impossible 3 (12A)
We feel your pain, Tom
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.After respectively dull and vaporous episodes directed by Brian de Palma and John Woo, Mission: Impossible 3 falls into the hands of a TV hack: a de luxe auteur hack perhaps, Lost creator J J Abrams, but on this evidence a hack nonetheless. Abrams may be famous for bringing surrealism and subsonic rumbles to TV desert-island adventure, but his one formal innovation here is a mildly disorienting pre-credit face-off between Cruise's masterspy Ethan Hunt and Philip Seymour Hoffman's petulant villain.
Other than that, only the bruisingly frenetic pace distinguishes the film from any other over-budgeted post-Bond knock-off. It's all there: the inconceivably lethal McGuffin, the international settings ("Berlin Germany", "Rome Italy" and "Shanghai China", as the captions note with admirable precision), and a vamp (Maggie Q) whose taste in evening wear is, you can't help feeling, entirely inappropriate for a Vatican drinks reception. The one interesting oddity is a snazzy bit of software that instantly crafts a perfect latex mask of Hoffman. That sums up this film: it inhabits a world in which a face like Hoffman's - baggy, humorous, ungroomable - can only be conceived of as a special effect.
By contrast, the muscular insincerity of Tom Cruise's physiognomy reaches new levels of phoniness, so much so that M:i:3 (as the publicity insists on calling it) could well deal the coup de grâce to his teetering public appeal. He's unable to do anything here without either flashing a hyper-muscular life's-grrrreat grin or furrowing his brow in soul-straining anguish (whenever a manly tear glistens in his eye, you just know he's been putting in extra hours on the Intense Empathy Workout Programme).
Hoffman doesn't look happy, or terribly interested; Michelle Monaghan, so snappy in Kiss Kiss Bang Bang, makes do with being pert, as a wholesome Katie Holmes surrogate; only Simon Pegg's console-bound techie raises the spirits. What ought to be the breathtaking showstopper - the assault on a Shanghai skyscraper - is thrown away with breathtaking contempt in a matter of minutes. The whole thing's messy, unsatisfying and generally an insult to the intelligence - especially when it comes on all smart by putting spuriously literate one-liners into the mouth of Laurence Fishburne's grouchy security boss.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments