Manderlay (15)

Nicholas Barber
Saturday 04 March 2006 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Lars von Trier's inflammatory follow-up to Dogville is another theatrical production, shot on a bare soundstage with just a few props, and with lines painted on the floor to denote the walls of the buildings. Once again, the heroine is Grace, last seen driving away with her gangster father and his private army. But in Manderlay, Bryce Dallas Howard has taken over the lead role from Nicole Kidman, presumably because she was busy with something more worthwhile, such as Bewitched or The Stepford Wives.

As the film begins, the gangsters' convoy stops off at an Alabama plantation where slavery is still in place, 70 years after it was banned. Grace demands that her father's men free the slaves by any means necessary. Her father (Willem Defoe) sneers that the workers won't be able to handle their emancipation, so Grace elects to stay behind, along with a lawyer and a quartet of tommy-gun toting enforcers, to ease the transition from tyranny to democracy. It doesn't go well.

Von Trier's caustic commentary on race relations and foreign policy doesn't have Dogville's novelty value, and, edited down to almost an hour shorter than that film, it doesn't have its cumulative power, either: for once, I wished a two-hour film were longer. But it's still indubitablythe work of one of cinema's most provocative, literary and devilishly cunning storytellers.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in