I'm Still Here (15)

Reviewed,Anthony Quinn
Friday 17 September 2010 06:24 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

When two-times Oscar nominee Joaquin Phoenix announced that he was giving up acting to pursue his dream of becoming a hip-hop artist, many were bemused.

They will continue being so after watching this mightily peculiar quasi-documentary, directed by brother-in-law Casey Affleck, which purports to chart Phoenix's disastrous career switch and very public humiliation. It involves a ludicrous appearance on the David Letterman's show, one of two very droll sequences, the other being the facial expression of Sean "Puffy" Combs on hearing the demo that Phoenix hopes will encourage him to produce his hip-hop album: let's just say it's not a rapper's delight. Rabbinically bearded and tubby of girth, Phoenix himself cuts an ever more unstable and paranoid figure, most notably in his drug consumption, his hiring of call-girls and the foul-mouthed abuse he screams at his coterie of "friends" – who seem little more than paid-up stooges. What's going on? Is this a cautionary tale? A suicide note? A backfiring chronicle of celebrity breakdown? And the more you think about that, the more likely seems the possibility that it's all a put-on, a mischievous conceptual squib designed to arouse our pity, then to mock us for being taken in. Whichever way you slice it, you'd have to say it's more exasperating than exhilarating. Scene by scene it's slow going, particularly when you keep asking yourself if any of it is "true". It's one thing to pull off a hoax; it's quite another to transform the fakery into authentic entertainment.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in