All the King's Men (12A)

You're a lame duck, governor

Saturday 28 October 2006 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

All The King's Men is a film with a specific audience in mind, and that audience consists entirely of Academy Award voters. It's got a bombastic score and bucketloads of symbolism and period detail; it's based on a Pulitzer-winning novel; and the cast is like a middlebrow Ocean's Eleven: Sean Penn, Jude Law, Kate Winslet, Anthony Hopkins, James Gandolfini, Patricia Clarkson and Mark Ruffalo all get their barnstorming Oscar-clip speeches. If only All The King's Men were any good, it might have swept the boards at prize-giving time.

Like the 1949 version, which did indeed take home an armful of Oscars, it features a meek Louisiana salesman (Penn) who proves that power corrupts when he's elected as state governor. But in Steven Zaillian's film, the governor - an inflammatory demagogue, even though it's impossible to make out half of what he says - is suddenly demoted to a minor character, and the spotlight falls on Law, an ex-reporter who's become Penn's flunky. This jarring switch is just one sign of a bungled editing job which cuts out all the most crucial parts of the story.

Even the governor's transformation from incorruptible family man to lecherous monster happens as abruptly as if a passing witch had waved a wand and turned him into a frog. The film is like a jigsaw with half the pieces missing. Presumably, a less confusing, three-hour long cut is already being planned, so you should vote with your feet until then.

n.barber@independent.co.uk

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in