Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Will Smith reveals why he really turned down Django Unchained: 'I don't believe in violence as the reaction to violence'

Smith referenced the recent Paris terrorist attacks when discussing his attitude to violence and revenge

Jess Denham
Tuesday 24 November 2015 04:18 EST
Comments
Will Smith passed up the lead role in Django Unchained to do Men in Black instead
Will Smith passed up the lead role in Django Unchained to do Men in Black instead (Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

He said at the time that the part simply wasn’t big enough but nearly three years later, Will Smith has elaborated on his reasons for turning down the lead role in Oscars hit Django Unchained.

Quentin Tarantino offered the titular character to Smith but the director and actor “couldn’t see eye to eye” on the creative direction of the story.

Jamie Foxx ended up playing the revenge-seeking former slave while Smith opted for Men in Black instead, claiming that he passed the role up because he thought Christoph Waltz’s bounty hunter would steal the limelight. He watched the film, which grossed $425 million globally, and described it as “brilliant, just not for me”.

Smith has now revealed that the size of the part (interestingly Waltz ended up winning Best Supporting Actor, not Best Leading Actor) was of lesser consequence to him than his own strong principles regarding violence.

Speaking at The Hollywood Reporter’s annual actor roundtable, Smith explained that although the idea of a man learning how to kill so he can rescue his wife from slavery is “perfect”, his vision did not line up with Tarantino’s.

“I wanted to make the greatest love story that African Americans had ever seen,” he said. “We talked, we met, we sat for hours and hours about it. I wanted to make that movie so badly, but I felt the only way was,it had to be a love story, not a vengeance story.”

Smith added that he does not “believe in violence as the reaction to violence” before referencing the Paris terrorist attacks, which led to the deaths of 130 people earlier this month.

“We can’t look at what happens in Paris and want to f**k somebody up for that,” he said. “Violence begets violence. I just couldn’t connect to violence being the answer. Love had to be the answer.”

Predictably, Tarantino, who is known for bloody violence galore in his movies, disagreed with Smith and the discussions came to an end. Django went on to notch up a body count of 64.

Christoph Waltz and Jamie Foxx in Django Unchained
Christoph Waltz and Jamie Foxx in Django Unchained

It remains to be seen how much violence Smith’s upcoming supervillain movie Suicide Squad will involve when it arrives in UK cinemas on 5 August 2016.

His next film, sport biopic Concussion, will go head to head with Tarantino’s The Hateful Eight upon its release on Christmas Day this year.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in