Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Titanic: Infamous ‘plot hole’ was explained by James Cameron years ago

Film is returning to cinemas for Valentine’s Day 2023

Louis Chilton
Saturday 25 June 2022 14:11 EDT
Comments
Titanic - Trailer

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

James Cameron’s record-breaking romance Titanic is set to make its way back onto screens with a new remastered re-release.

The 1997 film, which starred Leonardo DiCaprio and Kate Winslet, will return to cinemas in time for Valentine’s Day 2023.

While the film has continued to fascinate viewers for two and a half decades, there’s always been one lingering “plot hole” that fans have been unable to let go of.

The moment occurs near the end of the film, when Rose (Winslet) is floating on a door, after the Titanic has capsized. Her lover, Jack (DiCaprio) is seen floating in the water next to her, before eventually freezing to death.

While the scene has endured as a powerful and heart-wrenching moment of tragedy, many viewers over the years have asked the same question: Why didn’t Jack just climb up on the door with her?

In fact, so persistant has this question been, that the film’s cast and even its director have addressed it explicitly.

Winslet has spoken at length about the issue, once saying: “I think he could have actually fit on that bit of door.”

She’s also praised DiCaprio’s feelings towards the controversial ending: “He really doesn’t care about the door.”

Leonardo DiCaprio and Kate Winslet in ‘Titanic'
Leonardo DiCaprio and Kate Winslet in ‘Titanic' (Paramount)

In an interview back in 2017, Cameron was asked about Jack’s death.

“The answer is very simple because it says on page 147 [of the script] that Jack dies,” the Avatar director said. “Very simple.”

Cameron went on to express dismay at being still asked about the artistic choice: “I think it’s all kind of silly, really, that we’re having this discussion 20 years later. But it does show that the film was effective in making Jack so endearing to the audience that it hurts them to see him die.”

“Had he lived, the ending of the film would have been meaningless. The film is about death and separation; he had to die. So whether it was that, or whether a smoke stack fell on him, he was going down. It’s called art, things happen for artistic reasons, not for physics reasons.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in