Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

The Oscars: An insight into the mind of an Academy Award voter

 

Will Dean
Thursday 21 February 2013 14:33 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

“People who haven’t even seen the film are going to vote for it because it just has that smell.” So says an anonymous director and member of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences (like Marty and Steve over there) of the costume design in Joe Wright’s adaptation of Tolstoy’s Anna Karenina.

The film-trade magazine The Hollywood Reporter had the luxury of looking over the director’s shoulder as he cast his vote for Sunday’s awards.

The piece revealed the thought process (or lack of) behind votes that can – in theory – make or break careers. The director was mostly thoughtful and reasoned in his voting – for instance, Life of Pi is ignored for best cinematography due to its reliance on CGI (Skyfall gets the nod). However, Pi does get his vote for best score because it’s “perfect” and John Williams “has enough fucking Oscars”.

The reasoning for his choice for best live-action short, Curfew, is that it is the “least depressing of five films guaranteed to prevent you getting laid”. His choice for best animated feature is decided by flipping his iPhone to decide between ParaNorman and Wreck-It Ralph.

Our anonymous friend’s choice of best supporting actress (Les Mis’s Anne Hathaway) is because “not just anybody can come in and kill one song; there are many songs that Hugh Jackman and Russell Crowe should have been killed for”. Best-animated-short nominees ought to look away now: our man made his choice (Disney’s beautiful Paperman) based on hearing it was good – he hadn’t actually seen it.

And what of the big one, best picture? He plumps for Zero Dark Thirty and hates all the others apart from Lincoln: “Django Unchained is Tarantino masturbating for three hours.”

As entertaining as his insights are, they’re even handier if you’ve got an office Oscars sweepstake and need a few pointers. Read the whole interview: bit.ly/oscarinsider.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in