The Crow remake director hits back at Bill Skarsgård’s criticism of the film
‘I don’t think that’s true at all,’ filmmaker said of lead star’s honest opinion
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The director of The Crow remake has hit back at Bill Skarsgård’s criticism of the finished film.
In the reboot, It star Skarsgård plays the role originally made famous by Brandon Lee. The film has become one of the worst-reviewed films of the year since it was released in cinemas earlier this month.
Directed by Rupert Sanders, the film marks the first sequel in the Crow franchise to receive a cinema release since 1996’s The Crow: City of Angels, but reactions from fans suggest it might have been smarter to dump the movie on streaming rather than give it a full unveiling.
One person who was not too happy with the end product is Skarsgård, who recently criticised the film’s ending.
“I personally preferred something more definitive,” he told Esquire of the film’s closing scenes, which he believes leaves things open for a sequel.
However, Sanders disagrees with Skarsgård assessment, telling Variety: “Ironically, I don’t think that’s true at all.”
He continued: “If there is a sequel down the line, maybe 30 years from now, they’re gonna have to figure out a way to get themselves out of jail a bit because it’s certainly not, “What happens next?” That would be cheap and not the sentiment in which we made the film. Bill and I probably watched five endings together, I probably cut 20 endings.
Sanders said he thinks “the editing and the cinema language, instead of words, is really what elevates the film”, adding: “So the ending came out of a lot of trial and error: How do we find this emotional ending? The people you invest in through the whole film are not allowed to be together again, but you want this feeling that it all was worth it.
“It’s the right ending for the movie and there’s something very decisive about our ending. It’s not expected, it’s not ‘happy’ and it’s certainly not like, Wait for the sequel!’
Fortunately for Skarsgård, it seems the film’s dismal box office takings will prevent any follow-ups from ever being made.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments