Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Stardust: Johnny Flynn would rather appear in unauthorised Bowie film than ‘bland and safe’ music biopics

Actor said that biopics can become ‘homogenised [and] slightly suppressed’ with the involvement of the artist’s estate

Isobel Lewis
Saturday 16 January 2021 06:51 EST
Comments
Stardust trailer

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Johnny Flynn has defended controversial David Bowie biopic Stardust in comparison to other “bland and safe” music films.

The film, set during Bowie’s younger years, was released in the UK on Friday (15 January). It has been near universally panned by critics and fans for going ahead without Bowie’s music or, as his son Duncan Jones put it in 2019, “the family’s blessing”.

Stardust has naturally been compared to authorised recent biopics such as Rocketman and Bohemian Rhapsody, but appearing on Sky News’ Backstage podcast, its star Flynn said that Jones’s comments weren’t an explicit condemnation that the film shouldn’t exist.

"I think you could argue that this story told with the complicit cooperation of an estate would mean that it becomes a homogenised, slightly suppressed version of the story,” Flynn said.

“And with all due respect to the Bowie estate and family, we just wanted to be able to tell the story that we wanted to tell.”

The actor continued: “All too often, we’ve seen with musician biopics and other biopics recently that eventually things just become, I think, a bit bland and safe because of the estate trying to protect the legacy of the subject.”

In an interview for The Independent, Flynn said that he was “not into” films like Rocketman and Bohemian Rhapsody, which respectively involved Elton John and the remaining members of Queen in their production process.

The Lovesick star walked away from the role of drummer Roger Taylor in the Freddie Mercury biopic, explaining: “I saw the estate and the band starting to kind of change the scripts and doctor things, and I pulled out a bit at that point because it changed so much. And I thought, ‘That’s not fair on people.’”

The Independent’s Clarisse Loughrey called Stardust “a flimsy, unrecognisable portrait of Bowie” in her two-star review of the film.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in