Marvel to lose Spider-Man rights if Far from Home fails to gross ‘a billion dollars’
Reported contract clause could have led to a “quickie” Spider-Man/Venom crossover
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Spider-Man: Far from Home has proven a runaway success this summer, grossing over $600 million worldwide. But according to a new industry report, Marvel Studios may lose the rights to the superhero if the film somehow struggles to gross $400 million more.
In a recent edition of the industry newsletter The Ankler, entertainment journalist Richard Rushfield has claimed that the deal struck by Sony and Marvel Studios in 2015, allowing both studios to share the Spider-Man character and enable him to appear in the Marvel Cinematic Universe, came with an unusual clause.
“The original Sony/Marvel/Spidey deal to co-produce these movies stipulated that if this Spidey [Far from Home] cleared a billion, Marvel would get to oversee a third. If it hadn’t, full control would have reverted back to Sony,” he writes.
Rushfield also claimed that Sony would have likely attempted to launch a crossover film featuring Spider-Man and Tom Hardy’s Venom, in what he called “a quickie mash-up that very potentially could’ve sunk both [properties]”.
The stipulation was likely written to enable Marvel to cleanly wash their hands of the property if the Tom Holland Spider-Man movies were poorly received by audiences, in a similar fashion to the regretful Fantastic Four reboot or even the Andrew Garfield run of Spidey films.
Luckily for Marvel, Far from Home looks set to be a major financial triumph for the studio, with the film already ranking as the sixth most successful movie of the year despite being in cinemas for just over a week.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments