Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Michelle Williams and Mark Wahlberg pay disparity investigated by Screen Actors Guild

Walhberg was reportedly paid 1,500 times more than Williams for reshooting All The Money In The World

Roisin O'Connor
Thursday 11 January 2018 09:41 EST
Comments
All The Money In The World Clip - Set My Son Free

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Screen Actors Guild is investigating whether Ridley Scott's film All The Money In The World broke any of its contract rules after reports emerged that actor Mark Walhberg apparently received $1.5m to reshoot scenes with Christopher Plummer.

The unprecedented reshoots took place over nine days after multiple men came forward with accusations of sexual misconduct against Kevin Spacey.

Scott enlisted the cast and crew to reshoot scenes in London and Rome with Plummer, who replaced Spacey in the role of J. Paul Getty, just weeks before the film’s release date.

Scott had previously told USA Today that everyone apart from the crew and Plummer had agreed to do the reshoots for “nothing".

However reports in the Washington Post and USA Today claimed Walhberg received $1.5m to do the scenes, while Williams had received just above scale, totalling less than $1,000.

A SAG-AFTRA spokesperson said in a statement: “We are unambiguously in favour of pay equity between men and women in this industry and support every action to move in this direction."

An unidentified Deadline source claimed: “If Williams was paid at least scale for the reshoots, there’s nothing SAG-AFTRA can do about it, and anything Wahlberg may have negotiated above scale is OK with the union.”

According to the USA Today report, Williams was not told about Walhberg's fee when she agreed to do the extra work for minimal pay.

The news prompted uproar in the film world and became a rallying cry for the gender pay gap in Hollywood, with figures including Jessica Chastain and Judd Apatow calling for answers as to how such a huge disparity between actors had occurred.

Arguing against claims that Walhberg was the more bankable star, Vulture reporter Mark Harris pointed out the domestic gross for his last five wide releases was $476.9m. Williams's last five took $505.3m.

Walhberg was also recently named as the "most overpaid actor of 2017" by Forbes.

Follow Independent Culture on Facebook

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in