Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Love Actually child actor Lulu Popplewell tears into ‘s***’ Richard Curtis film: ‘It's aged badly’

Lulu Popplewell didn’t hold back

Jacob Stolworthy
Friday 16 October 2020 05:09 EDT
Comments
Heartbreaking Love Actually scene where Karen confronts Harry over his affair

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

One of the child actors who appeared in Love Actually has revealed they think the film is pretty rubbish.

Since being released in 2003, the Richard Curtis film has become a Christmas staple with many households setting it aside for an annual watch.

Now, comedian Lulu Popplewell, who played the daughter of Emma Thompson and Alan Rickman's characters, has called it a “s*** film”.

Popplewell, 29,  was Daisy, the child who won the part of the lobster in her school nativity play.

Speaking on podcast Almost Famous, Popplewell said: “Look, softly be it spoken, I think it's a s*** film.”

Despite this, Popplewell insisted she didn’t regret working on the film, but said she thought it had “aged badly”.

She particularly criticised how Curtis wrote the female characters, calling them “passive objects”.

“You also have to remember that he [Richard Curtis] was writing in the context of the time. I mean I don't know how he excuses more recent work. But it was in 2003 or whenever it was out.”

She acknowledged that she doesn't like cheesy films, stating: “I'm glad people like it.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in