Cannes Film Festival charges Canadian journalists to interview stars such as Brad Pitt
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Interviews with Hollywood’s top stars can be staid affairs. Reined in by a host of publicists and PRs, very rarely do they let slip anything of great interest. But now Canadian journalists at the Cannes Film Festival have been told they must pay for the privilege.
In a move Toronto’s Globe and Mail described as “anathema to respectable publications and broadcast outlets”, Canadian distribution company Alliance Films sent out a detailed menu of how much face time with each star will cost.
A television interview with Brad Pitt, who is in France promoting Killing Me Softly, costs £2,400, while a one-on-one print interview with Twilight and On The Road star Kristen Stewart is £800.
Der Spiegel magazine also revealed that German journalists who wanted interviews with The Paperboy actors Nicole Kidman and Matthew McConaughey would need to pay an undisclosed fee.
It is uncommon to have a pay-for-entry policy on junkets of this type. Interviews are normally granted for free on the basis that their appearance in the news creates goodwill and publicity. But in this case, Alliance passed on the cost of organising the junkets to the journalists themselves.
In a statement to Canadian magazine Macleans, Alliance spokesperson Carmite Cohen said the interviews would have been offered for free at an upcoming junket in North America. “Alliance decided not to contribute to the costs of the Cannes junket, which we found to be exorbitant,” she said, adding: “We didn’t want to prevent Canadian journalists from having access to the Cannes junkets for these films if they wanted to participate and gain earlier access. It was on this basis that you were provided with the price list. There is absolutely no economic benefit derived by Alliance from this opportunity.”
Flying stars such as Pitt, Stewart and their considerable entourages to festivals across the globe incurs considerable costs. There has been speculation that Alliance, which backed unlikely blockbuster The King’s Speech and awards darling Shame, could simply be trying to keep expenses down ahead of its upcoming sale.
Goldman Sachs announced in January that it was getting rid of its two thirds stake in the company, with a decision on the winning bid expected imminently.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments