Brad Pitt slams ’crafty’ removal of judge amid custody battle with Angelina Jolie
Angelina Jolie has been pressing for the disqualification of the judge
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Brad Pitt has challenged a California appellate court’s decision to disqualify the judge presiding over his divorce case with Angelina Jolie.
In court filings dated 1 September, the Once Upon a Time... in Hollywood actor argued that the decision to remove judge John W Ouderkirk from his ongoing custody battle with Jolie should be reviewed by California’s highest court.
The Maleficent actor, meanwhile, has been pressing for the disqualification of judge Ouderkirk since August last year, on grounds he had failed to disclose “ongoing business and professional relationships” with Pitt’s lawyers.
The 2nd District Court of Appeal in California finally granted Jolie’s request to have judge Ouderkirk removed on 23 July.
“Judge Ouderkirk’s ethical breach, considered together with the information disclosed concerning his recent professional relationships with Pitt’s counsel, might cause an objective person, aware of all the facts, reasonably to entertain a doubt as to the judge’s ability to be impartial. Disqualification is required,” said a three-judge panel.
In the 1 September response, Pitt said the judge had been forthcoming over his links with the Fight Club actor and provided multiple disclosures on the matter since 2017. Judge Ouderkirk awarded Pitt joint custody over his six kids in May this year. His removal might reverse that ruling.
Pitt’s response claimed the appellate court made an “administrative error” that could undo “an important and considered custody decision.”
The 87-page court document filed by Theodore J Boutrous Jr, who is Pitt’s attorney, slammed the “crafty” removal of Judge Ouderkirk and alleged that “the lower court’s ruling will reward parties who are losing child custody cases and condone their gamesmanship.”
“Allowing this kind of crafty litigation strategy will deprive parents of irreplaceable time with their children as judges are disqualified for minor reasons in the midst of their cases,” said the document.
The former couple have been locked in a bitter custody battle over their kids Maddox, Pax, Zahara, Shiloh and twins Knox and Vivienne since they split up in 2016.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments