Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Batman v Superman set to be less profitable than Man of Steel

Financial analysts have said the film will need to make at least $1.15 billion to gross the equivalent

Jack Shepherd
Monday 11 April 2016 06:17 EDT
Comments
Superman in Man of Steel
Superman in Man of Steel (AP)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

With Batman v Superman having made almost $800 million and topping the worldwide box office for three consecutive weeks, it seems there’s no stopping the superhero behemoth.

However, with the current week-to-week drop-off, the film may not make it to the billion dollar mark, something Warner Bros were likely banking on.

Previously, it has been reported that the film will need to break $925 million to land a profit. A new financial analyst has weighed into the discussion, arguing how Batman v Superman may not make more profit than predecessor Man of Steel.

Speaking to Bloomberg, SNL Kagan analyst Wade Holden said, for the new film to earn the estimated $300 million profit Man of Steel made, it would have to gross at least $1.15 billion worldwide.

“They were probably hoping for box-office numbers similar to Avengers: Age of Ultron, since Batman v Superman had DC’s three most well-known comic book heroes together in the same movie -- Batman, Superman and Wonder Woman,” Holden told the publication.

Warner Bros. obviously still have faith in their DC brand, having announced two new “as-yet-untitled” DC film last week. They’re also still going ahead with plans for their Justice League films, which must mean they’re confident in Zack Snyder still, right?

Meanwhile, the director spoke about a scene that didn’t make it to the final cut of Batman v Superman, but one that would have filled in a major plot hole.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in