Good Scene / Bad Scene
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE GOOD: Vivre sa vie, Jean-Luc Godard, 1962
The film is about a woman who is becoming a prostitute. It's a very touching story because of the way she retains her personality and integrity. This is shown particularly in a humiliating scene when Nana (played by Anna Karina) has been caught and is giving her name to a police officer. She looks directly at him, and it's wonderful how she uses her eyes. She's shy, but at the same time a little provocative. I like that ambiguity. She's a wonderful actress who is stripped by the director to very minimal actions, but gives a lot of herself in that scene. The best scenes give the whole story - and this one contains the entire plot of the film. In my own film-making, I believe in the strength of the scene, even that it should have priority over continuity. I would even say that a scene can be more important than the complete film.
THE BAD: Magnolia, Paul Thomas Anderson, 1999
This came to my mind immediately, particularly the scene when hundreds of frogs drop out of the sky. I hate it for its sheer vulgarity. I'm a big fan of surrealism, but this is a cheap bombardment of the senses. I don't have any idea of or interest in what the frogs represent. I work with surrealism and I try to juxtapose elements subtly so that I am questioning the very language of film: What is image? What is sound? What is the function of music? I like to play with these things. I also like the surrealism found in life everyday . I live in Haiti and life there is full of surreal scenes, which I try to film. I also like early surrealist movies by Luis Bunuel and Salvador Dali. Which brings me to a point about Magnolia and film-making in general - it's behind the times compared to other arts. Surrealism in movies hasn't developed.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments