Film: Wild Angle
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference."What I really want to do is act" was once the favourite refrain of the model bent on being "taken seriously". But these days, beautiful airheads would do well to skip the thespian stage and head straight for the camera, craftily leap-frogging all those actors moaning that what they really want to do is direct. The actor-director is not a new thing. As a species, they're a bit like the actor- managers of Victorian theatre, a megalomaniac breed that transmuted with Darwinian ease into the likes of Charlie Chaplin when moving pictures came along. These were monumental talents with egos to match, choreographing themselves in their own movies.
The difference these days seems to be that the auteur theory has been replaced by the idea that anyone can do it. If stars are rich enough, they fund their own pet projects. Mel Gibson sank $20 million of his own money into Braveheart, for instance. And then there's always the studio. Executives are happy to humour the aspirations of actors, knowing that a "star director" always guarantees some kind of box-office, and so are currently sending their big names off to be directors. The results are sometimes surprisingly accomplished. Dances with Wolves confounded Cassandra critics; Tim Robbins's shoestring budgeted Bob Roberts was a decent slice of satire, and veteran cowboy, Clint Eastwood, once again proved his skill in the directing saddle when he rewrote the western in Unforgiven.
More often, though, they are less than inspirational. Take Home for the Holidays, this week's release from Jodie Foster, a brilliant actress and director of the pedestrian Little Man Tate. The film is a mishmash of satire, farce and some embarrassingly over-the-top caricatures that conform to all the stereotypes of the dysfunctional family drama. Although the film is pure middle-of-the-road hokum, Foster's name, a small budget and a clutch of respectable stars including Robert Downey Jr and Holly Hunter lend the film putative credibility as an "independent" movie. And there's a rash of others to follow. Matthew Broderick gets weighty with Infinity, a film about a physicist, written by his mum; Tom Hanks has turned out the lumpen That Thing You Do! and Angelica Huston's Bastard out of Carolina has already kicked up a pre-release storm after receiving the censure of super-mogul, Ted Turner. Even small fry Kevin Spacey has decided to take a swim with the Hollywood sharks with his failed heist movie Albino Alligator. The star decided not to act in the film because he felt that that might smack of a "vanity" production. Hmmm.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments