Exhibitions: A GREAT BRITISH INSTITUTION

Fiona Sturges
Saturday 07 June 1997 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Age: the first Summer Exhibition was in 1769, a year after the Royal Academy's foundation, and the show has been held annually ever since, even during the wars.

Character: a key fixture in the social calendar, the show's opening feels more like a cocktail party than an exhibition. The sponsor is Guinness, but the ladies in hats are more likely to be sipping Pimm's.

How are the exhibits chosen? Up to 11,000 pictures are submitted every year. To make it into the show, works must get past the Selection Committee and the appropriately named "Hanging" Committee, both made up of Royal Academicians. 1,200 works are chosen (compared to 136 in 1769). This year's show features 699 artists, with a strong contingent of RAs among them.

Alumni? Previous exhibitors include Turner, Gainsborough and Hockney. But there's dignity in rejection. Constable and Stanley Spencer are among those who got turned down.

What's new this year? Summer shows usually commemorate RAs who have recently died. The 1997 show is notable for a different sort of departure: RB Kitaj's. As he returns to the US, Sandra Three is his parting shot against the critics who panned his 1994 retrospective, and whom he blames for his wife's death.

What price fine art? The most expensive work is Kitaj's - a cool pounds 1m. But Juliet Blaxland's jollier Life in a Listed Building costs just pounds 10.

Any dead sharks? No. Hirst and the Britpack are still unrepresented. Small wonder when the youngest person ever to sit on the Selection Committee was 35. It's a long way from Hoxton to Piccadilly.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in