ETCETERA / Design Dinosaurs: 18 The Pakamac

Antony Woodward
Saturday 28 May 1994 18:02 EDT
Comments

IN THE 1820s Charles Macintosh fabricated the first genuinely waterproof waterproof from his own patented 'india-rubber cloth', using proofed seams. In 1851 George Spill inserted metal eyelets under the armpits to provide an outlet for perspiration. A year or two later, Crimean war hero Baron Raglan devised a garment from old potato sacks to keep his soldiers warm. It had diagonal slashes across the corners, from which developed the roomy 'raglan sleeve' for over-garments. In 1914 Thomas Burberry designed his weatherproof for warfare, the trench-coat. It was in 1949 that Leslie Cohen made the final entry in the Cloakroom of Fame. He adapted these classically styled garments to the material of the moment: plastic.

On Cohen's coat there was not a stitch of thread, even to hold the buttons on. In shiny grey or black, it had welded seams and buttons, it came single-breasted with optional hood, or in a trench-coat version (with fly-front and welded belt and epaulettes). It rustled prodigiously. It was light, handy, foldable to pocket-handkerchief size, and he called it the Pakamac.

Being easily mistakable for a carrier bag, it suffers by comparison with classier rainwear. Which misses the point. Its real rival was never other macs, but another great British weather accessory, the umbrella. Convenient (less likely to be left on the train), thoroughly modern (this was the Age of Nylon), in its time the Pakamac was even acceptable wear for HMQ (though the Royal Warrant was not forthcoming). After its launch, there was a deluge of sales: 60,000 a week within 15 years.

Gradually, however, people realised that the only thing damper than walking in the rain unprotected was doing so encased in sealed polythene. Sales slowed to a drizzle, and production finally dried up completely in the Eighties. In 1988, however, the Pakamac reigned once again, when S Casket Ltd bought the brand name. As British as galoshes, it can still be found by the persistent, priced pounds 12.99, and is as impractical for you today as it's always been.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in