ETCETERA / Chess
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.BRITAIN'S top woman player wonders where she went wrong against a talented Argentine.
White: S Arkell
Black: H Spangenberg
Hastings Challengers 1994.
Chess standards are rising all over the world but perhaps nowhere faster than in South America. In this game I was crushed by a teenager from Argentina, and am still unsure where I went wrong.
1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nd2 dxe4 4. Nxe4 Bd7
Exchanging pawns at move three side-steps the main lines, but is perfectly sound and respectable. Indeed 4 . . . Bd7 has such a reputation for solidity that it has become known as the 'Fort Knox' variation.
5. Nf3 Bc6 6. Bd3 Nd7 7. Qe2
This is unusual but seems very strong. I had previously encountered only 7. 0-0 when Ngf6 is perfectly satisfactory. The point of 7. Qe2 becomes clear two moves later.
7 . . . Ngf6 8. N4g5 Bd6 9. Ne5 0- 0 10. Bd2
Now the plot is revealed: he wants to castle Q-side and go for a quick kill on the other wing.
10 . . . h6 11. h4
At this point, I realised
that things were not going as planned. I cannot take his knight without allowing a quick mate down the h-file. All the same, I reasoned (perhaps somewhat optimistically), as long as his knight stays on g5 he has to calculate carefully that I can't remove it, and meanwhile I can create counterplay in the centre.
11 . . . Qe7 12. 0-0-0 Rad8 13. Rh3 Bxe5 14. dxe5 Nd5 15. c3]
An important move, giving his white-squared bishop a retreat. The apparent weakening of his king's defences is comparatively unimportant.
15 . . . Nc5 16. Bc2 b5 17. Rg3 hxg5
I must admit that his knight had been gnawing away at my nerves for a few moves by now. Capturing it was more a sign of irritation than anything approaching sound judgement.
18. Bxg5 f6 (see diagram)
This makes matters worse. I should have offered to return the piece with 18 . . . Nf4, though White is still much better after 19. Bxf4 or 19. Qg4.
19. Qh5] Nf4
Total desperation, but 19 . . . fxg5 is mated after 20. Bh7+ Kh8 21. Bg6+ Kg8 22. Qh7. After the move played, I was hoping for 20. Bxf4 Rxd1+ 21. Kxd1 Be4 but my opponent found a more accurate way to finish me off.
20. Bh7+ Kh8 21. Bf4 Rxd1+ 22. Kxd1 Rd8+ 23. Bd3+ resigns.
The only consolation is that someone might one day play the 4 . . . Bd7 line against me and give me the opportunity to try the same attacking idea.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments