Ross & Rachel, Edinburgh Fringe review: Thoughtful hour requires no prior knowledge of a certain American sitcom
How would the Friends couple fare with children, aging, sickness, and death?
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.What would have happened to Rachel and Ross from Friends after the fairytale ending? How would their relationship fare with children, aging, restlessness, boredom, sickness, and death? These are the questions asked by James Fritz’s perfectly formed play, a one-woman duologue performed with forensic focus by Molly Vevers. She flits between playing Rachel and Ross; words bubble out of her lips in double-time, but with clarity and flair.
If the premise sounds ticket-floggingly cute, it’s worth saying that this is a thoughtful hour that requires no prior knowledge of the American sit-com (though it’s seasoned with little references that will be funnier if you grew up with Friends ever-present on E4). Fritz finds a truthful personal story, presenting the divergent inner monologues of a couple now in their forties – Ross increasingly possessive of his “prom queen”, near-obsessive over Rachel’s beauty, convinced their love is eternal; Rachel is stifled and frustrated, cuttingly cruel about her “really fucking boring” husband and dreaming of affairs. The gap in their perception of the relationship is blackly comic – and gets much more painful once Ross is diagnosed with a brain tumour.
In truth, Ross & Rachel is almost too cynical. Ross’s sense of ownership over a woman he supposedly loves becoming menacing, but Rachel’s complete lack of sympathy towards a dying man she’s spent her life with also strains belief; not even Ross from Friends is so annoying that you wouldn’t feel a tug of compassion if he was dying…
Where Fritz’s play really excels, however, is in simultaneously probing the myth-making we engage in in our personal relationships, and the myth-making pop culture romance peddles – ‘happy ever after’, ‘meant for each other’, ‘together forever’ – and how one informs the other. How sit-com clichés come to define real love-lives. Ross & Rachel takes a fictional couple, and makes them look like a real couple that’s spent too much time watching fictional couples. Which, in this world of endless Friends repeats, is something we can all recognise.
To 31 Aug
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments