Dog days : LETTER

Clare Druett
Friday 17 February 1995 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

I was interested by the Weasel's discussion (Up & Down Canary Wharf, 4 February) of the possibilities of canine participation in criminal trials. Clearly the Lord Chief Justice was influenced in his recent decision by the outstanding performance in the witness box of Bob, a bulldog and faithful companion of Luke, who was before the assizes on a murder charge. A full account of the trial can be found in the Voyages of Doctor Dolittle by Hugh Lofting.

The judge took the precaution of testing the learned doctor's capacity to translate from Caninese by a simple expedient; the judge's own dog was summoned to court and the doctor was told to obtain information about what the judge had eaten for supper the previous night. The dog gave extremely interesting information about what the judge had eaten and, indeed, what else he had spent the evening doing!

On this basis, Bob was allowed to appear in the witness box, despite the spluttering objections of the prosecutor. He was placed on a high chair and "sat scowling down over the rail upon the amazed and gaping jury". Bob's dignity and veracity reduced the prosecutor to a feebly murmuring wreck, who had to be helped out of court. Bob's master was acquitted forthwith.

Witnesses of this calibre are rare indeed among the human race, so I support the call for more diverse participants. I suggest a golden eagle as judge, with seagulls as jurors; and two or three rooks would make perfect court ushers.

clare druett

Salisbury, Wiltshire

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in