Dance / Snappy suits are old hat

Jenny Gilbert
Saturday 17 June 1995 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

IN THE beginning was the name - the Featherstonehaughs. Once you knew how to pronounce it you were part of the clan - a clever piece of marketing. Then there was the line-up: a bunch of good-time guys, cheerful, streetwise, and not a pair of tights in sight. The mode was informal and witty, poking fun at the worn conventions of male posturing on stage. The "Fanshaws" were smart, and in bringing Rayban culture to dance, they brought dance to the Rayban wearers. Their appearance on The South Bank Show won the largest-ever TV audience for dance. But seven years on, Mafia-style shades and snappy suits are looking jaded, and so, sorry to say, are the Fans. Their '95 tour ended its run at Sadler's Wells this week in what should have been a blaze of glory. Instead it went out like a light.

The Featherstonehaughs Go Las Vegas. Why? When we think of that city, we think tacky glamour, and tacky glamour is, well, just tacky. It has no resonance, no relevance, no theatrical mileage beyond mimicry. The choreographer Lea Anderson (creator of all the Fans' shows) tries to justify her theme by suggesting that Las Vegas is a metaphor for television, and by implication, for the shallow quick-fix of modern living. The city of sin dresses up its interiors as Swiss chalets, Victorian ale-houses, the Taj Mahal; TV takes us places, too. It's a weak premise for a show, and nearly everything that followed lacked point.

The first number had pairs of Fans in natty checked suits and Sixties quiffs larking about with variety gestures and acrobatics that were meant to be comical in their awfulness. In the acute absence of laughter, one began to wonder whether the wobbles and grimaces weren't for real. And uncertainty, as all good showpeople know, is comedy's kiss of death.

A flicker of humour survived to illuminate a telling sequence based on the body language of chat shows. Two shiny pink sofas set the stage for the host and five interviewees who, with impressive co-ordination, crossed and uncrossed their legs, tweaked their hair, nodded and waggled their jaws as if someone had accidentally leant on fast-forward. A slower sequence on a swivel stool worked towards the same effect - making physical theatre from the gestural tics of the kind of performance that has become a commonplace of living-rooms.

At the door the audience had been issued with pencil-torches. We were to wait for a signal from the stage, hold them at eye-level, point and switch on. Something amazing would happen. Well, it didn't. My torch didn't even work. So the Fans were left looking like wallies and we were left feeling like wallies. The boys need a new gimmick, and they need one quick.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in