Dance: Sleeping Beauty Royal Ballet Royal Opera House, London

Sophie Constanti
Thursday 22 February 1996 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

To an IRA terrorist, Tuesday night's performance of Sleeping Beauty - an occasion designed to mark the 50th anniversary of the re-opening of the Royal Opera House after the war - must have seemed like a lost opportunity for yet another parcel of Semtex.

While John and Norma sat in the best dress circle seats, the Queen had to make do with the restricted view from the Royal Box. Elsewhere, the House hummed with the chatter of the "I was there in '46" brigade. But the performance, in attempting to show us that Sleeping Beauty is as much a touchstone of excellence now as it was in the Forties, was hampered by two things. First, the current, hideously designed production, courtesy of Maria Bjornson, has set and costumes which obstruct rather than enhance the dance. Second, the old school assembly encouraged tiresome "in our day" comparisons.

Over the past 50 years, the Royal Ballet has become a dead zone in terms of new choreography, but its standards of dancing have risen to new heights. And yet, interval comments on Darcey Bussell's Princess Aurora ranged from "She's still immature" to "She doesn't have Fonteyn's polish or authority." Indeed, her performance may have lacked sustained sparkle or characterisation, but it was carried by some exquisitely shaped dancing. In the style of Fonteyn, once described, astutely, as a work in progress, Bussell is still refining her gifts. Certainly, she has given better performances, but together she and Jonathan Cope (her Prince) made a vividly animated couple. And earlier, in the Rose Adagio, Bussell and Adam Cooper (as her most dashing cavalier) smiled in rightful delight at having achieved a poised and beautifully finished account of some of Petipa's most challenging choreography. After that, Bussell seemed occasionally to be racing against conductor Anthony Twiner's brisk time-keeping, but unhurried resplendence returned to her dancing during the last act.

The idea of grand defile and roll-call for 29 original cast members midway through Act 3 was a well intentioned if rather bizarre interpolation. Distinguished oldies put on their best ballet dancer's walk and took their seats on either side of the stage, watching the variations that bring the ballet to a close. They then moved to the centre of Bjornson's backdrop to be saluted by the company in an evocation of the court ballet of Louis XIV, only here under kitschy, peach-toned clouds. The evening ended with a tribute to De Valois. The 97-year-old cut the anniversary cake and glittering confetti rained on company and audience.

Will the 100th anniversary - depending on whether there is still a House and a Royal Ballet company - hold more significance for someone of my generation? By 2046, I'll have acquired geriatric status and maybe I, too, will mutter on about how much better it all was back in 1996. I won't have changed my mind about Bjornson's designs, with their confusion of interior / exterior space, clanking metal foliage and those garishly over- decorated costumes. Then again, today's eyesore may be remembered through a rose-tinted haze in 50 years' time.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in