Common Remedies: Bed rest

Dr Tony Smith
Saturday 17 October 1992 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

CONFINING a sick person to bed is a central feature of traditional medical care - but one that has been gradually abandoned over the past 30 years. In the Sixties someone in hospital after a heart attack would be kept in bed for as long as six weeks. For the first week or so complete rest was strictly enforced: the wretched patient was not even allowed to wash himself. Women who had given birth naturally to healthy babies were kept in hospital for 10 days, most of it in bed. Children were treated with the same conviction that bed rest was life-saving; those with rheumatic fever might be in bed for months. Children were kept in bed even for minor infections such as chicken pox - they were not allowed up until their temperatures had returned to normal. Rest in bed was also still the mainstay of treatment for tuberculosis.

These restrictions did have a reasonable basis. Observation had shown that injuries heal faster if the injured part is rested. The key to the treatment of fractures is that the broken bone is immobilised in a plaster cast; injured muscles and cuts in the skin heal faster and with less scarring if the arm or leg is kept still. Surely, doctors reasoned, a heart damaged by a coronary thrombosis, a lung damaged by tuberculosis, and the uterus after childbirth will heal faster and with less scarring if the whole body is put to rest.

So why has bed rest gone out of fashion? The answer is simple: it is too dangerous, especially for the sick. After an operation and during sickness, the blood clots more easily. Keeping someone in bed slows the circulation, and the blood stagnates in the veins deep inside the legs and pelvis. Blood clots form in these deep veins, and fragments may then be carried into the heart and lungs, where they become trapped - a pulmonary embolism. A big one may stop the heart. As many as a third of hospital patients examined after death have had a recent pulmonary embolism, and it is the main cause of death in many of these. In the days of prolonged bed rest, pulmonary embolism caused the deaths each year of thousands of patients recovering from minor operations and minor heart attacks - as well as healthy women recovering from childbirth.

Rest in bed, if prolonged beyond a week or so, leads to wasting of the muscles and thinning of the bones. It lowers morale and causes insomnia and constipation. And yet the underlying rationale - that it promotes healing - remains true. But rest can be nearly as complete while the patient is encouraged to walk around, keeping the blood gently circulating and the muscles in use. So the trend has been to get patients out of bed as soon as possible - and the optimum length of stay has been determined by comparing large numbers of patients treated by various periods of bed rest in hospital. Surgeons have experimented to find which operations can be done on an outpatient basis and how soon inpatients may be sent home.

These studies have led to very substantial shortenings in the average time people stay in hospital. The 'improvements in productivity' have a sound medical basis as well as cheering up administrators and politicians. What has gone is the tradition of invalidism that encouraged many young people with chronic illness to educate themselves by spending months lying in bed reading.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in