Prom 71: Daniil Trifonov/Thielemann/ Staatskapelle Dresden, Royal Albert Hall, review: ‘Came dangerously unstuck’

Twenty-five-year-old pianist Daniil Trifonov is now fulfilling the promise which earned him the Tchaikovsky Gold Medal, but by applying a light Chopin touch, he showed that he doesn’t get the point of this music

Michael Church
Thursday 08 September 2016 07:01 EDT
Comments
Pianist Daniil Trifonov performs with the Staatskapelle Dresden under the direction of Christian Thielemann
Pianist Daniil Trifonov performs with the Staatskapelle Dresden under the direction of Christian Thielemann (BBC/Oliver Killig)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Twenty-five-year-old Daniil Trifonov, currently basking in mega-stardom, is without question a fine artist, and is now fulfilling the promise which earned him the Tchaikovsky Gold Medal. His Chopin and Liszt are dazzling, but his Mozart has hitherto been an unknown quantity: Prom 71, in which he would play Mozart’s “Piano Concerto No 21 in C major” with the Staatskapelle Dresden under Christian Thielemann’s direction, would be revealing, particularly in view of the fact that Daniel Barenboim had played two other Mozart concertos on the preceding nights.

In the event, the contrast in their approaches could not have been starker: while Barenboim’s aim was to honour the beauty of what Mozart had written, the way Trifonov advanced on his concerto was reminiscent of a small boy armed with a spray-can. There’s sparkling passage-work at the beginning of the third movement, but Trifonov muddied the effect by injecting a sub-passage (in a different key) of his own, and as the movement progressed he added fussy little curlicues and flounces. The two cadenzas were also his own: look-at-me exercises which negated the music they should have served.

There may be far fewer notes in Mozart than in Liszt, but Trifonov – going recklessly fast – came dangerously unstuck at one point in the first movement. And by applying a light Chopin touch, he showed that he doesn’t get the point of this music. Perhaps, in time, the penny will drop.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in