A World Requiem: BBC Symphony Chorus / Botstein, Royal Albert Hall, London

Michael Church
Monday 12 November 2007 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Not many pre-concert lectures draw as large a crowd as the one for John Foulds's A World Requiem, but few have such an interesting story. After stumbling on this gigantic work by accident, Calum MacDonald has spent 30 years championing it: this would be its first performance since 1926. It draws on the words of John Bunyan, the prophet Isaiah, the Psalms, and the medieval poet Kabir, and is pervaded by the ideas of Theosophy, the mystical quasi-religion to which Foulds and his circle adhered.

Its premiere at the Albert Hall was a popular but not critical success; it had three more performances – one relegated to a smaller venue – before the British Legion withdrew its patronage, and the conductor Adrian Boult, music director of the BBC, declined to rescue it. So why was it "mysteriously axed", as the programme melodramatically claimed? Was it not such a hit the second time round?

With Leon Botstein conducting the BBC Symphony Chorus, three other choirs and a substantial orchestra, we could judge for ourselves; the 90-minute, 20-movement work would be performed without an interval, and would be broadcast live on Radio 3.

Three minutes in, my defences were down as Gerald Finley intoned an ecstatic response over a muted chorus: no other baritone can touch him for declamatory expressiveness. The next few movements followed each other seamlessly, with each bringing delights: eerily chromatic slides, a small chorus accompanied by a brass quartet, a boys' choir suddenly sounding from the heavens with microtonal harmonies.

When Finley addressed all the nations of the world, he was answered by fanfares from the gallery at all points of the compass. The first half closed, as it had opened, with a beautifully shaped "Requiem".

But as the second half of this work unfolded, one realised its limitations. It was all about voices and effects, and its ecstatic tone became increasingly monotonous: apart from an iffy French soprano, this was as good a performance as it could conceivably get, yet by the end one was mildly bored. "Axed" – or just expired?

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in