Classical Music / ALEXEEV & DEMIDENKO Radio 3

Adrian Jack
Wednesday 14 June 1995 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

There's something extravagant about music for two pianos; if the players seem to be sparring as much as bonding, it just adds piquancy. But piano attacks are the most difficult things to coordinate in music, simply because they're so percussive, and unlike percussion players, pianists do not spend their lives learning to fit in with others. With the exception of distinguished duo-pianists like the Labeque Sisters, most pianists tend to be loners.

So an occasion like Monday's BBC lunchtime recital (repeated 6.30pm Sunday R3), in which two Russian virtuosi joined hands, is rather special. Dmitri Alexeev and Nikolai Demidenko included Rachmaninov's Second Suite and Symphonic Dances on a particularly brilliant CD released last year: the ground was well prepared. In the opening March of the Second Suite, though, electricity seemed at slightly low voltage, for the chugging activity which carries the music can generate more excitement than the rather humdrum effect it had here.

The following Waltz had a nice sense of elan; it was light and trim. The purple sweetness of the Romance was kept uncloying by a sense of tasteful reserve, but how treacherous for two pianos it is, with exposed lines that need those irrational little delays before important notes. The players were, in any case, careful not to overload Rachmaninov's sumptuous, expertly woven textures, and the final Tarantella was both gorgeous and delicate.

Despite its title, the Suite is really symphonic in the serious way its ideas are developed, though they're not extended on the larger formal framework of the Symphonic Dances. Here, the ripe romantic warmth of the Suite is superseded by a more objective, bracing quality and, in the slower sections, an element of sour and sinister pessimism, which is assuaged in the conciliatory final moments of the third dance. It's not only the Dies Irae motif that suggests the music has a religious subtext.

In some ways, the two-piano version of the Dances is preferable to Rachmaninov's orchestration, because the more specific associations brought to the music by orchestral instruments limit its character. Still, the slow sections of the outer dances do seem to cry out for more sustaining power than pianos can manage. Their percussive articulation suits the slithering chromaticism of the central waltz, beautifully played without undue gush, and the reprise of the fast section in the final dance was deliciously crisp and exciting.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in