Chess: Trickery of performing pieces

William Hartston
Sunday 30 January 1994 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A GOOD chess composition often has the pieces performing tricks of which one would not have believed them capable. An outstanding composition features a succession of such tricks, strung together to achieve a higher order of astonishment.

ch31outw-misc-nws

Today's position, by Mark Liburkin (1910- 1953), is a good example of the best in endgame studies. The start should not be too difficult. Black threatens to promote his pawn and give mate, so the opening move must be 1. Nd5+ or 1. Ne4+. Since 1. Nd5+ Kd2 leaves White defenceless, it must be the other one. So where does Black go after 1. Ne4+? If Kxc4 or Kd4, then 2. Kb2 will win easily, so it must be 1 . . . Kd3]

Now 2. Kb2 is met by Be5+ followed by promotion of the pawn, so the white knight has more work to do with 2. Nc5+ Kc3 and now 3. Nb3 removes the immediate danger from the c-pawn. Black, to keep the game going must play 3 . . . Be5] with the terrible threat of Kd3+.

White now has two possibilities to distract the bishop: 4. Bh2 and 4. f4. After 4. Bh2 Bg7 (4 . . . Bh8 allows e8=Q and the new queen attacks the bishop) 5. e8=N (again attacking the bishop) Bh8] White runs out of ways to defend the long diagonal, but this suggests the correct path: 4. f4] Bg7 (or Bf6) 5. e8=N] Bh8 and now we keep going with 6. f5] threatening to cut off the bishop's line with f6. Black must escape with 6 . . . Be5 and now, for want of anything else, White goes back to the other idea: 7. Bh2]

One point now is that 7 . . . Bd4 loses to 8. Bf4] when the bishop relieves the knight from covering c1 and allows Nxd4 in reply to a check. So Black has nothing better than 7 . . . Bxh2 and White must find something to do when the bishop returns to e5. At first 8. Nf6 Be5 9. Nd7 looks tempting, but 9 . . . Bd4] is then very strong. It's time to use the b-pawn: 8. b7] Be5 and now 9. b8=Q is obvious . . . and wrong] Black replies 9 . . . Kxc4+] 10. Qxe5 c1=Q+ 11. Nxc1 - stalemate.

The answer, therefore, is 9. b8=B]] Bxb8 10. Nc7] (delaying the bishop's return to e5) Bxc7 11. e7 Be5 and now 12. e8=Q? again allows stalemate after Kxc4+, but 12. e8=R]] completes the job. After 12 . . . Bg7 13. Re6] Bd4 14. Re1] and White squeezes out the win after 14 . . . Bf6 15. Rb1] Kxc4+ 16. Rb2.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in