Chess: Changing attack
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.WHILE John Nunn was defending himself against everything Mikhail Krasenkov could throw in their critical last-round game at Hastings, the other players were providing some excellent supporting acts.
The British champion, Michael Hennigan, won a good game against Dibyendu Barua; Ketevan Arakhamia and Ian Rogers had a complex tussle ending in a draw by stalemate; and Matthew Sadler accepted all Ilya Gurevich's sacrifices to emerge a rook ahead with an easy win. That left Hennigan, Sadler and Sadler sharing third place, but it was the also-rans who produced the most remarkable game.
Mikhail Sherbakov, who had been having a rotten tournament, played a piece sacrifice against Mark Hebden that looked like a piece of bravado from the man in last place. A whole knight seemed a high price just to wrest the initiative from Black, but Hebden's men never found any co-ordination.
When Black played 19 . . . fxg3 and 20 . . . g4, he must have been optimistic. After the g-pawn is exchanged, Black's queen will come to g5, the knight can move to f6 and g4, and every piece is well-placed for an attack on the king.
Sherbakov's 21. f4] was an inspired solution to the problem. After the loss of his knight and exchange of bishops on d4, White's control of the f-file cuts Black's game in two. Objectively, it is unlikely that the whole idea will stand up to detailed analysis, but in practical terms it was undoubtedly the right thing to do. An unexpected and sudden shift from attack to defence is something that can upset the best players. Here it seemed to reduce Hebden to confusion, until his game fell apart after 35. Qxc5]
White: Sherbakov
Black: Hebden
1 d4 Nf6
2 Nf3 g6
3 c4 Bg7
4 Nc3 0-0
5 e4 d6
6 Be2 e5
7 0-0 Nc6
8 d5 Ne7
9 Nd2 Ne8
10 b4 f5
11 c5 Kh8
12 a4 Ng8
13 a5 f4
14 Ba3 Nh6
15 b5 g5
16 f3 Rf6
17 Nc4 dxc5
18 Bxc5 Rg6
19 g4 fxg3
20 hxg3 g4
21 f4 exf4
22 Rxf4 Bxc3
23 Bd4+ Bxd4+
24 Qxd4+ Kg8
25 Raf1 Nd6
26 Qf2 Bd7
27 Ne5 Rg7
28 Nxd7 Rxd7
29 e5 Ndf7
30 Qe3 Qe7
31 e6 Ng5
32 Rf6 Rxd5
33 Bc4 Rc5
34 Kh1 Rd8
35 Qxc5 Qxc5
36 e7+ Kg7
37 exd8=Q Nf3
38 R6xf3 gxf3
39 Qd7+ Kg6
40 Bd3+ Kg5
41 Qd8+ 1-0
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments