Chess

William Hartston
Tuesday 23 February 1993 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

OF THE three recent matches, Fischer-Spassky, Short- Timman and Polgar-Spassky, the last has produced certainly the most entertaining and arguably the best chess. The extraordinary circumstances and huge prize of Fischer-Spassky and the importance to both players of Short-Timman led to blunder-inducing tension. When Judit Polgar met Boris Spassky, however, it was, notwithstanding the dollars 200,000 prize fund, a great deal of fun, and it showed in the uninhibitedly spirited play of both contestants.

The eighth game, which gave Polgar an unbeatable 5-3 lead, also saw a splendid piece of opening preparation. Repeating the second game until White's 15th move, Spassky 'improved' with 15 . . . d5. The idea is that after 16. exd5 Nxd5, White has problems defending the pawn on c3, as Polgar found to her cost in a 1991 game against Alexander Belyavsky.

This time she was ready with 16. Bg5] h6 17. Bh4] inviting 17 . . . g5 18. Nxg5 hxg5 19. Bxg5. Not wanting his king's defences ripped apart in this fashion, Spassky found a different way to win a piece. He must have missed 23. e6] and 24. Ne5] regaining the material with a winning advantage.

Here are the moves, with Polgar White, Spassky Black.

1 e4 e5 22 Rd4 Re7

2 Nf3 Nc6 23 e6 fxe6

3 Bb5 a6 24 Ne5 Rg7

4 Ba4 Nf6 25 Rxd7 Qg5

5 0-0 Be7 26 Qf3 Rd8

6 Re1 b5 27 Rxg7+ Qxg7

7 Bb3 d6 28 Re1 Bc5

8 c3 0-0 29 Ng4 Qg6

9 h3 Nb8 30 Qf4 Bb6

10 d4 Nbd7 31 Nxh6+ Kg7

11 Nbd2 Bb7 32 Qxh4 Qf6

12 Bc2 Re8 33 Qxf6+ Kxf6

13 Nf1 Bf8 34 Re2 Rd1+

14 Ng3 g6 35 Kh2 Rc1

15 b3 d5 36 g4 Rxc3

16 Bg5 h6 37 h4 Rd3

17 Bh4 dxe4 38 g5+ Ke7

18 Nxe4 g5 39 g6 Kf8

19 dxe5 Nxe4 40 Rxe6 Rf3

20 Bxe4 Bxe4 41 Ng4 Rf5

21 Rxe4 gxh4 42 Kg3 1-0

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in