Bridge: Yet another hard-luck story
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.BRIDGE is a game in which hard-luck stories proliferate. I felt particularly sorry for West on this deal from a pairs event where, in spite of finding an inspired defence to beat a vulnerable game, he ended with a below average score.
North-South game; dealer South
North
C Q 9 5
H K 7 2
D A Q J 9 5
S K 3
West
K 4
A Q 10 9 3
4 3
Q 10 9 2
East
7 3 2
8 6
K 10 6 2
J 7 6 5
South
A J 10 8 6
J 5 4
8 7
A 8 4
After two passes West opened One Heart and North, with Two Diamonds as a reasonable alternative, chose to overcall with One No-trump.
South forced to game with Three Spades and, with only a single guard in hearts, North bid Four Spades.
West led the ten of clubs and, after winning in dummy (East signalling with the seven), declarer took a trump finesse.
West won and stopped to think. It seemed clear that the defenders had no more tricks to come in the black suits and that East held
the king of diamonds - remember that South had passed as dealer.
It was, therefore, necessary to look for two tricks in the hearts.
It was possible that East held a singleton heart but West judged well when he played his partner for two cards in the suit. He found just the right switch - the queen of hearts. Now it was all over. Dummy's king won but the diamond finesse had to be taken and, when it lost, a heart came back for West to collect two tricks in the suit.
Why was this a poor result? At most other tables South had simply raised to game in no-trumps. East led a heart and, although declarer could have settled for one off by playing on spades, it seemed popular to play on diamonds - and this led to a two-trick defeat.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments