Bridge: Text-book hitch
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.SOUTH on this week's deal was a well-read player. He had read somewhere that the right way to play a suit of KQ10987 in dummy (which has only one side entry) facing two low cards in hand is to take a first- round finesse of the ten. This play is designed to prevent East, with AJx in the critical suit, ducking if one of the top honours has been played. Unfortunately there was a hitch that South's text-book did not mention . . .
Love all; dealer South
North
A 7 2
K
K Q 10 9 8 7
J 7 6
West
4
J 10 9 8 5 3
4 2
Q 4 3 2
East
Q J 10 9 3
7 6 2
A J 3
K 10
South
K 8 6 5
A Q 4
6 5
A 9 8 5
South opened One No- trump (12-14 points) and North raised to game. West led the jack of hearts against Three No-trumps, removing one of dummy's entries. It was clear that the diamond suit had to be brought in and you can see where South's reading led him. Correctly he judged that if he came to hand with a spade and led a diamond to the king, East would hold off and thereby kill the diamond suit.
Accordingly, after entering his hand with a spade to the king, declarer led a diamond and finessed dummy's ten. It may well have been the correct play in isolation but East won with the jack and (unsportingly) counter-attacked with the queen of spades. Now, when he got in again with the ace of diamonds, he had three spade tricks to cash and defeat the contract.
It looks silly but try the effect of leading the seven of diamonds from dummy at trick two. This means giving up two tricks in the suit no matter how it is divided, but the defenders cannot break through in any department for South still has the spades doubly guarded. This would have led to ten tricks instead of an embarrassing eight.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments