Bridge: It pays to consider all the options

Alan Hiron
Wednesday 23 February 1994 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

SOUTH considered two possible lines of play in his contract of Six Spades on this deal. Rightly deciding that one offered better chances than the other, he played accordingly and went down. Instead of claiming that he had 'played with the percentages', he would have done better to take a third possibility into account.

Love all; dealer South

North

S 6 5

H 9 3

D A Q J 6 5 4 2

C A Q

West

8 3 2

Q J 10 5

K 8 7

K 10 3

East

9 4

K 8 6 2

10 9

J 8 7 6 4

South

A K Q J 10 7

A 7 4

3

9 5 2

South opened One Spade and North responded Two Diamonds. South jumped to Three Spades and, hoping that South could show diamond support, North explored with Four Clubs. South, unsure of his partner's intentions, temporised with Four Hearts, and after North's next bid of Four Spades, advanced fearlessly to Six Spades.

It was all rather hit and miss, but the final contract was reasonable. West led the queen of hearts and declarer considered how best to utilise dummy's long suit. As the cards lie, a straight finesse succeeds, but to play the ace and take a ruffing finesse seemed an improvement, as this catered for East holding the singleton king. South drew trumps and played on these lines, but West won with the king of diamonds and cashed a heart.

The best approach (after drawing trumps) would have been to play the ace of diamonds and ruff a low diamond. Now declarer is home if the king is doubleton in either defender's hand. If, as happens, both follow with low diamonds, a winning finesse in clubs will provide the required extra entry to the table.

This line will also work (assuming the club finesse to be right) when West shows out on the second round of diamonds - then the marked ruffing finesse brings in the long suit.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in