Bridge: Falling into the tender trap
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.IN A recent pairs event one hand proved something of a rarity - the bidding and result (failure in Three No-trumps) were the same at nearly all the tables. One declarer, however, set a trap into which West fell.
Love all; dealer East
North
S. 8 5 3 2
H. 5 2
D. 10
C. J 10 9 7 6 5
West
S. K J 10 9 7
H. 10
D. A 5 4 3 2
C. Q 8
East
S. Q
H. K J 9 8 7 6 3
D. Q J
C. 4 3 2
South
S. A 6 4
H. A Q 4
D. K 9 8 7 6
C. A K
East opened Three Hearts and South's natural bid of Three No- trumps ended the auction. West led the ten of hearts and, after winning and surveying dummy, most declarers led a diamond.
East won and cleared the hearts, but although South found the correct play of leading the king of diamonds next (finding the ace alone would not have helped) successfully pinning East's queen, this still led to only eight tricks.
How did the successful declarer tackle matters? After winning the heart he played off the ace and king of clubs, dropping West's queen. With no entry to the winning clubs he did not seem to have achieved much but when he followed with the well- chosen nine of diamonds, West had a problem.
Was it possible that South held K Q J 9 in diamonds and was about to sneak in an entry to the table? Reasoning this way West went in with the ace of diamonds and suddenly, declarer's diamond suit had blossomed into four winners.
East appealed to me afterwards - was his play (with which his partner was unimpressed) really so terrible? Diplomatically I told him that I would have played in just the same way.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments