bridge

Alan Hiron
Thursday 08 August 1996 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

"Well," remarked South philosophically after going down in his game contract on this deal, "at least I spotted that there were two possible lines of play. Unluckily, I chose the wrong one." I leave you to judge whether he really was "unlucky".

West opened 1# and East chose the simple response of 2# rather than show his hearts with a hand that was (barely) worth only one bid. South bid a firm 4! and all passed, although both opponents gave the matter some consideration.

West led #A and, after ruffing, declarer played off !A to discover the bad heart break. He continued with !K and a heart to the jack. East switched to 4Q and declarer held off but won the spade continuation.

Now he had come to the crossroads. Should he rely on a 3-3 club break (when he could discard his losing spade) or give up another trump and hope that East had started with only two spades?

Eventually, South decided to pin his hopes on the club break and, as a result, went down when East ruffed the third round.

The alternative plan of giving up another trump would have worked for East would not have been able to lead another spade. Then South's remaining trumps would have left West with the choice of unguarding either spades or clubs.

Well, as I asked earlier, was South unlucky? The answer is: Not really. His line of play would only gain over the other when both black suits divide 3-3. And this would place West with seven diamonds and his partner with a 3-4-3-3 distribution - most unlikely on the bidding.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in