Bridge

Alan Hiron
Friday 24 September 1999 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

IT WAS left to me to congratulate West on his devastating opening lead as partner, normally affable enough, was too stunned.

South opened 1NT. As North, I bid a Stayman Two Clubs, and on hearing Two Spades from partner, jumped to Three No-trumps. On lead, West, naturally enough, elected to lead a spade. However, he chose the spade four rather than the text-book king. ("Lead top of three touching honours.") Partner made the correct technical play of the ace from dummy, expecting to block the run of the suit if they broke 5-2.

The contract seemed routine enough - knock out the ace of hearts to give one spade, three heart, two diamond and three club tricks. If the spades broke 4-3, that would give the opposition three spade tricks, plus the HA. And if they broke 5-2, or even 6-1, the run of the suit would be blocked, as West would have led a low card from one or two higher honours - or so reasoned South.

I felt for partner when East took the ace of hearts and returned a small spade, for West to cash four tricks in the suit. West explained his anti- regulation lead. "I was convinced that our only chance of beating the contract was by making four spade tricks, plus another in the wash. With no outside entry to my hand, and knowing that South held four spades, I played for East to hold 10x, or for the position to be as it was and for a competent declarer to play the ace at trick one."

At least West paid my partner the compliment of being competent, but it was poor consolation.

Love all;

dealer South

North

4A9

!K 10 6 4

#K 6 5 2

2K 9 5

West East

4K Q J 4 3 47 5

!8 5 2 !A 9 7

#9 3 #Q J 10 7

2J 7 4 28 6 3 2

South

410 8 6 2

!Q J 3

#A 8 4

2A Q 10

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in