The Dictionary of Media and Communications, By Daniel Chandler & Rod Munday
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.This book is a useful corrective to the assumption that media studies is an easy option. The entry on "relevance theory" informs us it is "a theory of pragmatics based on the principle... it is a necessary condition for communication that all utterances are presumed to be related to contextual assumptions."
The semiotic mists also swirl in entries on falsified metacommunication, linguistic relativism, paradigmatic axis... Despite the book's impressive scope, ranging from flâneur to whip-pan and from big close-up to Enlightenment (Age of), there is one odd omission.
A consideration of panopticon, Bentham's prison in which all prisoners would be continuously observed, mentions Foucault, but not Orwell.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments