The Chase by Candida Clark

The world of hunting's secrets and lies, but not its blood and guts

Marianne Brace
Sunday 16 April 2006 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Yet there's more than tradition at stake in Candida Clark's novel. Leo suspects his wife of having an affair with an old friend. The old friend believes his own wife is deceiving him. It's five years to the day that Celia miscarried Leo's son while riding. Now, she has some important news and hopes "the family might again grow strong". But secrets and misunderstandings lurk behind the cashmere sweaters and the gun racks.

In The Chase, characters feel "the gravity of history rushing in". Someone considers the pointlessness of huntsmen who can't hunt. But these people are already anachronisms: in this pocket of privilege, a 36-year-old is regarded as "a boy"; an Old Etonian likens his lover to a well-made boat. What they fear most is change. There's a touch here, too, of Bernard Shaw's Lady Utterword, thinking that "Everyone can see that the people who hunt are the right people and the people who don't are the wrong ones".

Unlike the Domeynes, with their distinguished pedigree, Lance Ash, the backbencher who helped the law through, is a man without history or, indeed, a future. Grammar school-educated, he lives in a suburb of anonymous commuters and has no children. While those gathering for the meet are athletic, handsome even, Ash has a "milky weakening" look.

Leo is jealous of his friend; the friend resents his wife's attention to an ex-cavalry officer. Is the anti-fox hunting legislation just another kind of envy, with civil servants taking a pop at nobs in pink? Yet hunting crosses the class divide. The novel nudges into new territory when Clark introduces the "terrier-men". These lawless Shropshire lads have inherited their livelihood from their fathers and their fathers before them: "If they were not this country, then who was?"

That's the really interesting question. Yet Clark doesn't pursue it, and, as one terrier-man also happens to be a rapist, it creates an unfortunate link between the hunt and a desire to inflict pain. Clark weaves the narrative threads together neatly, but her cool, reflective, occasionally opaque style feels at odds with such an inflammatory subject. The Chase misses the opportunity to tackle hunting's blood and guts.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in