The Books That Shaped Art History, Edited by John-Paul Stonard & Richard Shone. Thames & Hudson, £24.95
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.If you were asked to name just a handful of scholarly writers who have helped shape the modern sensibility when it came to looking and thinking about art, your list might go like this: Walter Benjamin, John Berger, Ernst Gombrich, Clement Greenberg. If you were really up on your art theory, you might add Rosalind Krauss, along with a few other names of a densely theoretical persuasion.
Get money off this title at the Independent book shop
But then you'd pick up The Books that Shaped Art History, a collection of 16 essays by different authors on the most influential art thinkers of the 20th century. And you might be surprised to find a John Berger-shaped hole. Missing too, is Walter Benjamin, whose The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction (1936) is surely on the reading list of every undergraduate humanities' student.
What to make of these omissions? Obviously, the editors Richard Shone and John-Paul Stonard couldn't include everything. Maybe they felt circumscribed by the length of the critical works under examination – books, not essays. But then we have Boris Groys's excellent account of Clement Greenberg, which concentrates on the American critic's most influential 1939 essay, "Avant-Garde and Kitsch" while more or less ignoring the other essays in his 1961 volume Art and Culture.
As for Berger, perhaps they wanted to leave out a book that started life as a television series. One can't help finding it odd, especially as Berger has had a profound impact on the way we look at pictures.
What's left, however, is a solid and impressive, if variable, account of art history. Some contributions are decidedly knotty. Short in length but seemingly interminable is Anna Lovatt's essay on Rosalind Krauss, though given the theoretical bent of Krauss's writing one may have sympathy. Richard Verdi's essay on Roger Fry's 1927 study of Cézanne is, on the other hand, entertaining, even rather gossipy, and highly informed.
It is an admirable collection, even without Berger. But one does wish all the contributions had been as lively as the ones on Fry and Greenberg.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments